Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • RSS

The Need to Feel Special

September 3rd, 2010

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

The need to feel special is common to human beings.  We want to know that we matter to others; we want to be seen.  We strive to achieve some special status in the eyes of others; how we are viewed by others matters to us.   One way of knowing that we are special is when people treat us differently than they treat others.  When we are singled out for special treatment, given special privileges, receive special favors, we feel special.

A problem can arise, however, when we feel uncomfortable with acknowledging our desire to be special.  Many people not only feel uncomfortable with this desire, but will go to great lengths to deny their desire for specialness as if it were a sign of weakness or other flaw in their personality.  These people often tend to act-out their desire to be special rather than acknowledge it.  And they often act out in ways that adversely affect their relationships.  They are are the folks who are always altering menus when ordering in a restaurant requesting special treatment in the form of dietary requirements.  They often will often request that you modify plans to suit them or adjust schedules to accommodate their special needs.

We have all been in the position of hoping for special treatment when we violate rules.  We hope that the traffic cop will let us off with a warning because of our “special circumstances.”  We want the airline to make an exception for us when we are late for a plane or when our luggage is a bit too large for a carry-on.  We are not bad people, we just want to receive that extra bit of attention to let us know that we matter in this very impersonal world; we want to be seen as a person, to be validated as unique.   The issue isn’t whether it is good or bad to want to be treated specially; rather, it is how we deal with the reality of when we are not.  And whether we can distinguish between being special and being treated specially. In other words, do we know that we can be special without being given special treatment?

Here’s an example from my practice:  I have a policy — developed over a period of four decades in practice — of requiring 48 hours advance notice for canceling appointments without being charged.  I have this policy in writing and reinforce it by an oral contract during the first session with all patients.  In the contract I specifically state that this policy will be strictly adhered to without exception for any reason; I even highlight the words for any reason. All patients sign this contract and indicate that they understand the policy.  In an attempt to be reasonable, however, understanding circumstances do arise making it difficult to abide by this policy, I also offer patients who cancel with less than the required 48 hour notice the opportunity to re-schedule as long as they re-schedule within the same week as the original appointment.  I have even suggested to patients that when they have to miss an appointment at the last minute or due to other circumstances, I will do a telephone session and, if necessary, outside of my normal work hours. Another aspect of the contract spells out that I am available 24/7 for emergency calls and also accept telephone calls between sessions when necessary; my cell phone is given on my outgoing message of my voice mail and I regularly respond to email. In other words, I go to great lengths to accommodate my patients.

Despite these precautions, there is always someone who wants and often expects special treatment and believes that if I do not grant them this special treatment that I am being unfair or unreasonable.  They often feel wounded and hurt, not to mention disappointed and often angry.  They claim that they did not remember the contract regarding cancellations or phone calls or alternative appointments.  And because they did not remember, they think I should make an exception.  They believe that I should pay for their errors, their decisions, and their memory.  And when I don’t accommodate them, they frequently act-out — much like the hurt child who runs away from home — by canceling their next appointment as though punishing me for not treating them as special.

What’s that about?  Why is it that some people believe that their special circumstances are more special than another person’s special circumstances?  Is it a case of wanting to be special  or selective hearing when it comes agreements as if to say ‘the rules don’t apply to me because I am special’? Or are they thinking, if you loved me you would make a special case just for me?  And if you don’t, you are just like everyone else who didn’t love me by going out of their way for me.

I don’t believe these individuals are mean-spirited or selfish.  I do not believe that they are trying to take advantage of me.  In my experience, these folks are hurting, damaged individuals, who never really felt special to anyone.  Their inner child craves being special.  They experience minor slights as major assaults. No matter how much people may have filled their “love bucket” as adults, the slightest injury is sufficient to drain the bucket.  It is as if their love bucket has a slow leak, leaving them running on empty most of the time.  Hence, when injured, disappointed, or hurt they feel devastated; it is often sufficient for them to want to terminate the relationship, whether with a friend, relative, or therapist.

It is often difficult to connect with them when in the midst of their hurt.  They can only focus on the specific circumstance rather than focusing on their internal experience without blaming the person who disappointed them.  Self-examination at the moment is not possible for them.  They simply sit with a sense of self-righteousness that they should have been treated so poorly.  In order for healing to occur, they must be able to fully experience their pain and their desire to feel special, to feel number #1 among others, friends, siblings, or patients.  Their sense of self-worth depends on their ability to be special.

The desire to be special is common for most people.  Some have experienced being special during their early and formative years.  They experienced that sense of specialness in the presence of the significant people or person in their life.  This early sense of specialness lets them know that they are important, can be loved, and can find love in the world.  Unfortunately, many people never feel that sense of specialness.  They question whether they are lovable.  They distrust others.  They distrust the love that may be shown them as they grow up feeling that they are not worthy of the love.  They test people, mostly to prove their own assumptions.  In those rare instances when they do feel a sense of specialness, they may idolize the person with whom they feel special.  And when this person disappoints them, as invariably happens, they feel crushed.  For them, the sense of connection is tenuous.  They cannot both feel special and disappointed.  It is as though they believe that to be special they must always have their expectations met.  They wish for an idealized world of the child for whom all needs are gratified.  It is as if they are  trying to achieve what they did not experience when they were a child.

When responding to these people it is important that you have a strong sense of who you are.  You must also hold your own boundaries rather take the easy route of capitulating to their demands.  To do so would only serve to reinforce their behavior while building your own resentment which, in turn, would weaken the bond between you. As difficult as it may be, without admitting wrong doing on your part, you must be empathic to their hurt and possible sense of betrayal. “I understand your disappointment at my not living up to your expectations and your sense of betrayal.  I do not see it the same way as you do, but I certainly understand and accept your feelings.”  This validates their experience without validating their demand for special consideration.  You can validate their desire without giving in to it.  It is important that you not judge them or shame them.

It would have been easy for me to capitulate to my patient’s expectations by simply forgiving the fee for the session.  The patient would have felt special, at least for the moment (until the next time) and I would have remained idealized by the patient.  The patient, however, would not have grown; his desire for specialness would not have been explored.  He would remain doomed to repeat this pattern.  But my job is not to be liked or idolized.  My job is to facilitate growth by helping patients confront themselves.  In this case my job was to help bring to the surface his repressed desire to be special and to be treated with special favor.  As a psychotherapist, I must always put my patient’s long term grow ahead of his desire for immediate gratification and my need to be admired.

Are You Special?

If you identify with the foregoing depiction, the following may be helpful to your self-healing:

  • you cannot assess your specialness to someone on the basis of their meeting your expectations
  • accept that not being given special treatment does not diminish you or the affection someone may have toward you
  • do not judge yourself
  • acknowledge your hurt without blaming the other person
  • accept that being disappointed is a human reaction to having expectations of others that are not met
  • do not evaluate the relationship on the basis of a single disappointment
  • do your own inner homework by asking yourself:  have you ever felt special;  is it easy for you to feel special; do you easily trust people; do you think that you are worthy of being considered special?

Once you are able to understand your history and connect it with your current behavior, patterns may begin to emerge. As you acknowledge your early emotional wounds, longings, and unmet desires, healing can begin.  Without such healing you may be prone to repeating the same drama repeatedly in various relationships making intimacy difficult.

Google Buzz
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • RSS

Is Once a Week Too Much?

August 27th, 2010

After 25 years of marriage our sex life is not bad, but my husband believes he is “entitled” to sex at least once a week. Sometimes even that feels like too much for me, and I don’t like to be “pressured” into having sex if I don’t feel like it. We are in our 60s. Is there a normal, or average, amount of sex for people our age? What is the appropriate response when one partner wants sex once a week and one doesn’t?

I am often asked the question as to what in the normal or average frequency for a couple to engage in sexual activity. The answer is simply that normal or average is not a relevant question when it comes to frequency. What is relevant is whether the sexual connection meets the needs of both parties involved and how the couple negotiates on how that need will be met. Too many couples think about frequency of sex as though there were an absolute standard. And when they think of sex they only think of sexual intercourse. Sexual intimacy is more than just intercourse. In involves an entire array of experiences shared between two parties. Perhaps if you and your husband viewed your sex life as an opportunity to connect with one another, to be romantic with one another, to get to truly know one another emotionally as well as physically, it might not feel so obligatory and “pressured” as you have described it. When was the last time the two of you took a bath together with candlelight and music? How long has been since your gave one another a full body massage with fragrent body lotion and soft music playing? Have you ever made picnic on the bedroom floor with a bottle of wine and your favorite delicasies? These are all part of a sexual relationship and you might enjoy them more than once a week and so might your husband. Being 60 years old has nothing to do with knowing how to make love; and making love is more than merely having intercourse.

Google Buzz
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • RSS

Doing Business with Friends or Relatives: Part III

August 21st, 2010

Merging Friendships (Relatives) and Business Relationships

As I have discussed in the previous two posts, friendships and business relationships represent two different paradigms for relating.  The former is more concerned about the emotional-personal connection or bond between the two parties, whereas the latter is focused on the project with the personal aspects only considered insofar as it will promote the project.  Another way of putting it is to say that friendships are about the relationship for its own sake, while the business relationship is primarily for the end result driven by a profit motive.

Since friendships are emotionally based and business is financially based, and since people have a distinct relationship with money that is particularly strong, bringing business into a friendship adds a level of volatility to the friendship that can be quite explosive. It is inherently unstable. Illustrating the conflict between money and life itself, the old-time comic, Jack Benny, tells the story of being held up by an armed gunman who said, “Your money or your life!”  to which Benny replies, “I’m thinking it over.”

So when friends decide to go into business together, or when a friend approaches you to buy a product or offers to “help save you money” if you do business with them, red flags of warning should immediately pop up.  You are swimming in dangerous waters.  The water may at first seem quite calm and even inviting, but the chances are high that a strong undertow exists.  The friendship can easily turn from being the safe, nurturing bond that had existed into a relationship filled with unstated expectations and pressures to perform experienced by both parties. As you and your friend’s attention is directed towards business and money, the bonds of friendship may dissolve.

Suggestions

  • Before doing business with a friend ask yourself whether the friendship is strong enough to endure the inevitable challenges of doing business together.
  • Explore the hidden expectations.  What do each of you expect from one another?
  • If you are being asked, are you given room to say “no” without jeopardizing the relationship? Ask yourself whether you feel pressured.
  • If you are doing the asking, are you giving room to your friend to say “no” without jeopardizing the relationship? Are you pressuring them.
  • Are you acting out of desperation, either pressuring or making decisions under duress which might affect your judgment?
  • Before going into a partnership with a friend/relative, ask yourself would whether you would do so if the person were NOT your friend or relative.  If the answer is “no” then don’t!
  • Be mindful of your preconceptions, assumptions, and presumptions: check out their validity in the real world.
  • Before doing business with a friend or relative ask yourself how comfortable you would feel if your were unhappy with the product or service and would it affect your relationship.
  • Most importantly, ask yourself whether you are willing to lose the relationship should something go awry in the business transaction.

[Please add your thoughts and experiences on this topic in the comment section of this blog.  This blog is intended as a forum for folks to raise issues, share experiences, and promote dialogue on important issues of contemporary life.   Please sign up as a Facebook Fan at www.docdreyfus.com/fanpage. For additional information about me and my practice, please visit my website at www.DocDreyfus.com.]

Google Buzz
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • RSS

Doing Business with Friends or Relatives: Part II

August 21st, 2010

As I indicated in Part I of this post, doing business with friends or relatives is tricky.  Many friendships have ended because people have attempted to do business or go into business with friends; relatives have gone so far as to stop speaking to one another for years and even for decades due to some business transaction.  One of the reasons for the difficulty of doing business with friends or relatives has to do with the emotional significance of money.  Few people have an attitude of “it’s only money.”  So, when we add the emotional component of money to the tricky nature of relationships, the two together makes for a minefield of difficulties.  More than one relationship has exploded trying to negotiate this territory.

I have known relatives and friends who have taken the position that they will not do business of any type with their friends or relatives.  They refuse to buy products from or use the services of friends or relatives simply to avoid the potential conflict.  I have also known friends and relatives who have taken great offense at being told by a friend or relative that they will not do business with them.  Damned if they do and damned if they don’t!  Emotional blackmail.  “If you don’t do business with me you are not being supportive of me.  And if you are not being supportive of me, then you can’t be my friend.”  For these people it is not sufficient for one to say, “I don’t want to do business with you even if I have to pay more for the product or service elsewhere.  I do not want to change the nature of our relationship.  It is too important to me.”  So we can see that even in this instance just how challenging an issue money is for people.  Most professionals, e.g., lawyers, physicians, psychologists, accountants, etc., understand that a friend or relative might feel uncomfortable doing business with them.  They accept that their friends and relatives might have other professionals provide service to them.  But this is not true for many people who are either personally insecure or financially desperate.  These people interpret the actions of others in a very self-centered manner and as a personal affront. I see many of these people in my psychotherapy practice.

Friendships and Business Relationships

Friendships focus primarily on an emotional bond or attachment.  Friendships usually are based on common values, similar backgrounds, common interests, or similar circumstances.  Most friends offer each other emotional support, succor, empathy, affection, and companionship.  Friendships can be of varying intensity ranging from something a bit more than acquaintances to intimate or best friends.  Friends may offer one another assistance in emergencies, help with special projects, and comfort in a crisis.  Usually you feel better about yourself when with your friend than you did before seeing your friend.  Similarly with relatives, but not always.  You do not get to choose your relatives; hence, you may be closer with some than with others.  Your expectations may vary with friends and with relatives.  However, in order for these relationships to flourish, these expectations should be explicit and mutually accepted (although they are often left unstated).  Hidden expectations that are unmet can lead to disappointments and tensions in the relationship.  The stronger the bond between the parties, the less chance that such disappointments will lead to disaster.

Business relationships (both partnerships and customer or client relationships) are based on a common business interest; they are emotionally at arms length.  There is no need for an emotional connect or bond because both parties are focused on the business transaction.  Business partners are engaged in developing a viable business that makes financial sense and rely on the profit motive to keep the partners connected.  These relationships can and should be negotiated, with each party articulating their expectations, goals, desires, and values.  The parties hammer out a business plan and partnership agreement; if they happen to like one another, so much the better.  And should a friendship develop, it will happen as they work together developing the business.  The primary focus, however, is the business with attention being payed to the relationship between the parties as needed for the growth of the business.  Friendship, however, is not a necessary aspect of the business relationship.  The same holds true for doing business with another person.  An accountant (lawyer, physician, electrician, hair-stylist) may like his/her client and vice versa. A bonus.  Nice, but not required.

Business relationships of all kinds are focused on the business interest; the parties to the relationship are not focused on one another. In friendships the focus is on one another; there is no business interest (i.e., service or product). Business relations are mediated by the business interest; friendships are direct. Regardless of how much one professes to be customer focused, the two people engaged in a business relationship would not be engaged with one another were it not for the business interest.  They probably wouldn’t even know one another.  As most business people would say, liking one’s customers is a bonus.

The problems begin when one tries to merge these two models.  This will be the focus of the next post in this series.

[Please add your thoughts and experiences on this topic in the comment section of this blog.  This blog is intended as a forum for folks to raise issues, share experiences, and promote dialogue on important issues of contemporary life.   Please sign up as a Facebook Fan at www.docdreyfus.com/fanpage. For additional information about me and my practice, please visit my website at www.DocDreyfus.com.]

Google Buzz
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • RSS

Doing Business with Friends or Relatives: Part I

August 20th, 2010

We have all heard stories of relatives not talking to each other for years or long-term friendships dissolving all because of some financial or business arrangement gone sour. As a psychologist I have been asked to consult with many families and friends where financial engagements have threatened the relationship or have created such turmoil and stress within the family that friends and families are engaged in litigation. The risks of engaging in business relationships with relatives and friends are many. The downside risk of such relationships may be greater than any upside potential financial gain. Unless these business relationships are carefully thought out, the business may jeopardize the friendship. Even when the relationship issues are carefully thought out the risk that the business relationship will damage the friendship is still high.

There are two types of business relationships I’d like to explore. The first type is where friends or relatives develop a partnership (i.e., your friend/relative becomes your business partner); the second type is where either you or your friend/relative becomes the customer of the other.

One of the reasons you might go into business with a relative or friend is convenience. However, if you form a partnership with someone you know, you short-circuit the search and vetting process. You fail to examine candidates that you do not already know that may have excellent business qualities. Another reason is presumed trust. You trust that your friend/relative will always honor your relationship and will not take advantage of you.  A third reason you might go into business with a friend/relative is that you assume that your friend or relation has business qualities that you require such as work ethic, skills, and business mindedness because you know and like them.

You figure that you like the person, enjoy being with them, so wouldn’t it be fun to go into business together.  You do not have to go through the trouble of vetting (looking into the background of the individual); history with the person serves as assurance that the person is trustworthy.  Your assumption is that the person is a good person who can be trusted.  But friendship and a good feeling about the person is not sufficient grounds for going into business with another person.  Many disappointments can be avoided by being more cautious.  But such caution can set of alarms in the other party as if their trustworthiness were being challenged from the beginning.  Just as love alone is insufficient for marriage, friendship alone is insufficient for going into business together.

And what about doing business with a friend or relative?  What about seeking out the services of a relative or friend, e.g., a lawyer, contractor, physician, financial adviser?  All is well when things are going well.  That is, when the lawyer gets you the result you wanted, the contractor builds your project to your liking, the physician heals your wounds or illness, and the financial adviser makes you money.  But what happens when things don’t turn out quite the way you had hoped or expected?  What happens when the lawyer loses the case, the contractor does a lousy job on your project, instead of getting well you get worse, and the financial adviser loses your life savings?  What happens to the friendship?

Similarly, what happens if you are running a business and your friend or relative decides to do patronize a different business for the same product or service? Will you feel offended? Will you still want to be friends with them? Will you be irritated if they are always seeking a discount from you or other special favor? How will you react if they don’t show sufficient gratitude? Whether you are the customer or business owner, a business relationship with a friend or relative can affect the friendship.

In wrestling with the question of whether to go into business with a friend, you might consider which type of relationship is easier to form. Is it easier for you to find a friend or to find a customer? Is it easier to find a friend or to find a company to do business with? Is it easier to find a friend or to find a business partner? Personally, I find good friends harder to find.  I find business relationships to be much more transient; once the business relationship ends, there is no further relationship. This isn’t to say that some friends or relatives don’t become great business partners; but such success stories may be rare.  Nor does this mean that no business relationship can develop into a friendship.  I am simply suggesting that with friendships require maintenance and when the focus becomes business, the friendship often gets neglected.

Future blog posts will explore the following questions:

  1. How can relationships (friends/relatives) be maintained when doing business?
  2. What happens when a friendship develops in the context of a business relationship? When the business stops what happens to the friendship?
  3. What happens when a friend chooses to do business with someone other than you? How does that affect your friendship?
  4. Why are friendships harder to develop than business relationships?
  5. What can be done to insure that the friendship endures even when the business relationship ceases to exist?

[Please add your thoughts and experiences on this topic in the comment section of this blog.  This blog is intended as a forum for folks to raise issues, share experiences, and promote dialogue on important issues of contemporary life.   Please sign up as a Facebook Fan at www.docdreyfus.com/fanpage. For additional information about me and my practice, please visit my website at www.DocDreyfus.com.]

Google Buzz
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • RSS

Is Help Always Helpful?

August 16th, 2010

Do you always want solutions when you share a problem with a friend? When you discuss your concerns with a friend, do you appreciate suggestions? Are you one of those people who have a closet full of suggestions and advice just itching for a problem to solve? Do you have difficulty maintaining intimate connections and use advice as a way to feel engaged?

There’s an old maxim that says, “To he who has but a hammer, everything looks like a nail.” There are people in this world whose mission it is to solve other people’s problems. They believe that they have answers to all problems. They feel good about themselves when they offer advice. As well meaning as these folks may be, they are often being insensitive to the real needs of others. Sometimes that is all they believe they have to offer. It is difficult for these people to understand that often when people share their travails, problems, concerns, or issues they are seeking a sympathetic ear, not solutions. Most people can solve their own problems, but they cannot be an empathic listener to themselves. That is why, to a large extent, people seek out psychotherapy. Many people have complained that their spouse doesn’t listen – they offer solutions instead. They then feel dismissed as if their mate were dismissing them with a quick-fix and is not willing to really listen to the nuance of what is being said. And their mate feels unappreciated because their advice is discounted or ignored.

Psychologists are trained to listen. We are not trained to solve the myriad problems presented to us on a daily basis. We are trained to “listen with a third ear”, as described by the eminent psychoanalyst Theodore Reik. To listen deeply to the meaning of what someone else is saying takes training and practice. In this problem-solving world in which we live, people seldom take the time to listen. With such deep listening, the patient feels fully understood. When patients feels fully understood, they are often more capable of solving their own problems. As patients feel understood, their anxiety decreases and the cloud of confusion dissipates. In this clearer environment, patients can see their own solutions. Although I’ve described this in terms of a psychological setting, this same process works in most relationships.

Women are usually much more able to listen than men. Men usually want to fix things; they want to solve problems. Today, however, as more women enter the once male dominated work place, they appear to be losing the ability to truly listen. Many have adopted the male problem solver mentality.

I often have experienced trying to share my own thoughts, feelings, and concerns with people only to have them try to solve what they perceive as a problem. Even when I tell them, “please, stop trying to solve my problem and instead try to understand the feeling behind the problem. I am perfectly capable of solving my own problems. What I need is a friend who is comfortable listening to me as I struggle” they often cannot resist trying to be helpful. Of course, I then stop talking with them about the things that are on my mind. These people don’t realize that they have aborted the potential intimacy between us.

Not all help is helpful. I am reminded of the Boy Scout who sees an old woman standing on a street corner. In his zeal to be helpful, and to earn a merit badge, he insists on helping her across the street. She struggles with him but the boy is strong and persistent. Upon reaching the other side of street feeling proud of himself, he looks at the woman with a smile on his face. She responds by hitting him with her purse saying, “Sonny, it took me a half-hour to get to the other side of the street where you found me!” Some people have difficulty engaging with others. Intimacy is difficult for them. Connecting in a deep and meaningful way either frightens them or leaves them feeling helpless. They develop their sense of self-worth in their ability to be helpful. Unless there is a problem to solve, they feel uneasy. So they offer help; it is difficult for them to just be with someone as that person struggles. It easier for them to solve the problem.

Advice and suggestions are not always bad. But before offering either, one must be certain of two things: first, that your advice or suggestions are wanted; and, second, that you are sure that you are offering your advice or suggestions for the benefit of the recipient and not for your own need to feel good about yourself or for personal gain.

I must confess that, as my family members will attest, I am not always good at following my own advice. But, more often than not, I ask whether advice or suggestions are wanted; I try to wait for an invitation to be helpful and ascertain whether my help is desired. And if so, what type of help is wanted.

Too often we may offer the type of help that we would want or what we think is warranted, rather than finding out what is required. Offering the help that you feel is necessary is similar to offering someone food when they need understanding, or a hammer when they need understanding. Or solving a problem when they need a hug.

And to make matters worse, some people become angry when their help is declined. Many people seem to believe that their advice, suggestions and help are like gold and become irate when others don’t accept their gold with gratitude. They cannot comprehend why their gold is being rejected; and they end up feeling personally rejected. When with these people, one often feels obligated to accept the help offered for fear of offending the them or losing their friendship. I think of this as emotional blackmail. It is as though these people are saying, “if you value me, you will value my help; and if you don’t, you are rejecting me.”

In conclusion, not all help — no matter how well meaning — is helpful. It behooves us all to become a bit more introspective as to our motives for being helpful, and a lot more circumspect in our offering of help. Sometimes help isn’t helpful; sometimes it can be inappropriate. On the other hand, sometimes not offering help when help is required can be equally inappropriate, such as standing idly by when someone is being mugged or when someone is injured in a car accident.

[Please add your thoughts and experiences on this topic in the comment section of this blog.  This blog is intended as a forum for folks to raise issues, share experiences, and promote dialogue on important issues of contemporay life.   Please sign up as a Fan at www.docdreyfus.com/fanpage. ]

Google Buzz
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • RSS

What’s this blog about?

August 15th, 2010

Dr. Edward A. Dreyfus, a clinical psychologist, relationship counselor, sex therapist, and life coach, posts articles and information regarding a variety of psychological issues confronting people every day. In addition, he responds to questions about relationships, sexual difficulties, and other concerns that have been submitted through his website. If you have pressing issues, psychological concerns on your mind, or other issue you would like addressed on this Blog, please drop a line. Maybe others will have a similar concern. This site can be used to generate dialogue amongst the visitors.

Google Buzz
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • RSS

Passionate or Sensible Marriage: Can You Have It All? (Part 2)

August 10th, 2010

Here’s another situation; some might call it a mid-life crisis story. Let’s call him Mel. Mel is 45 years old and has been married for 20 years; he and his wife have two teenage children. He married shortly after graduating college and a couple of years later started a family. Both he and his wife have careers, but his wife was the primary caregiver. She hovered over the children and made all of the decisions pertaining to their well-being. All of her emotional energy is consumed by work and the children. Mel is primarily her assistant in these matters. The only thing she and Mel have in common are the children, history, and they love one another. However, they do not share passion.

Mel works in his field and earns a significant income as does his wife. When the children were young, they used day care services for their care, dropping them off at a kindly woman’s home each morning and picking them up in the evening after work. When they began school they became involved with various sports and other after school events. Family life consist primarily of spending time on the weekends driving the children to and from their various activities. Dinner time is spent talking about the children’s activities or watching television during dinner. Mel and his wife have nothing else in common other than the children. Mel wants a deeper connection with his wife. She is perfectly satisfied with the life she created for them. She cannot understand why he is not happy as well. They have tried marriage counseling, but Mel’s wife does not understand what Mel wants nor does she understand why they are seeking counseling. Mel has tried to express what he wants: intellectual curiosity, to be understood, to feel an empathic connection. He has stated that he wants to be known. To his wife this is a foreign language. What should Mel do? He says that he loves his wife, but complains that there is no passion. They have a functional relationship, not a romantic, passionate one. Should Mel remain in his marriage? Should he seek passion and connection outside of the marriage? Or should he settle for what many people would say is a good enough marriage? He questions, “Is this as good as it gets?”

Both Mel and Joe (in my previous post) want passion in their relationships. Both have asked whether they are asking for too much. Think about your answer and ask yourself why you answered the way you did.

My answer is yes, no, and maybe. As I said in the beginning of these two posts, this is a tough one. Relationships in general are a tricky business. Each of us have different requirements for what we want in a mate. One of the problems is that people do not outline what they are looking for. They want magic. They expect relationships to simply happen as if preordained: fate. They like to believe in fairy tales with happily ever after endings. This rarely happens. Yeah, I know, some people do indeed experience love at first sight and live happily ever after. And some people actually win the lottery. The odds in both cases are tiny. The myth of “meant to be” and soul mate has led a lot of people to have painful endings to their relationship. The high divorce rate attests to the fact of few happy endings. As I suggest in my book, Someone Right for You: 21st Century Strategies for Find a Mate, you can increase the odds of finding your mate by appropriate planning.

Both Joe and Mel know what they wanted. They each had a list of requirements. This list includes two parts: those requirements that are essential and those that are important, but not essential. Joe wants someone towards whom he feels romantically and sexually drawn. He wants to “feel in love”; he wants passion. His girlfriend meets all the requirements on his “important” list, but he misses one of the qualities on his “essential” list.

Joe recognizes that he spends far more time with her engaged in the other areas of their relationship than in the romance department. But he feels that he doing these activities with a best friend, not with a lover. He has struggled with whether his “problem” is that he is afraid of intimacy and whether, if it were not for the romance issue, he would find something else to keep him from committing. He even struggled with the issue of commitment and whether he is afraid to commit. If it were the case that either intimacy or commitment were problematic for Joe, I would say that he should resolve those issues first before deciding whether to terminate the relationship. If these issues are not problematic for him, then he has to make a decision; is he willing to sacrifice all that he has with his girlfriend and continue his search for romance? The decision Joe has come to is to terminate the relationship and lower his expectations regarding the requirement on his “important” list. He decided that the characteristics on his “essential” list are, for him, inviolate and that he was willing to accept less than 90% on his “important” list. He decided he would be less “picky” about these items, but hold fast to the romance-sexual requirements.

Mel’s situation is different. While romance and sexual attraction are on his “essential” list, so are intellectual compatibility, being nurturing, curiosity, and empathy. So for him, sexual attraction is necessary but not sufficient. He wants a mate who engages with him on multiple levels; he wants what Joe has. For Mel love and sex alone, without the rest, is not enough. Mel would be more than content if he had what Joe has, even with the absence of romance. For Mel passion is not essential. Some people might think that Mel should be happy with his marriage as it is. After all, they reason, he has 20 years of history, two children, and a comfortable lifestyle. That should be enough. And perhaps for some that would be enough. However, Mel wants more than a sensible marriage. When Mel looks at his life and realizes that he has lived approximately half of his life thus far feeling that something is missing, not feeling understood, and other than children, he has nothing in common with his wife, and further realizes that has another 40 years left of his life, it does not seem unreasonable for him to say that wants to avail himself of the opportunity to be happy. So Mel has chosen to divorce. He wants something more. He wants to at least know that he gave himself a chance to be in a relationship and have a life where he feels connected and engaged rather than merely peripheral to his life. He would rather end up alone knowing he tried to find what he wants than to settle for mediocrity.

In conclusion, there is no right or wrong, good or bad. There are only choices. Joe and Mel are not asking for anything extraordinary or out of the realm of possibility. They simply want more than what they have. For Joe it is passion, for Mel it is a sense of being important and engaged with his mate. These men, and people in general, have the right to choose the type of relationship they want. They should choose what is important to them. But planning and thoughtfulness is required. Using these illustrations, my answer to the question of whether these two men were asking too much, was yes, no, and maybe.

The answer is yes, if they did not do sufficient psychological exploration, individually and as couples, to determine whether there were underlying individual or joint issues that were preventing them from getting what they wanted from the relationship.

The answer is no, if they have done their explorations and determined what they wanted from their partners was simply not available within the context of the relationship.

And maybe, if they are expecting to achieve 100% of what they want from their “essential” and “important” lists. As I said previously, a small number of people do win the lottery, most do not. In all relationships sacrifices and compromises are necessary.

Each of these men should decide what characteristics or traits are important to them and to what degree are each important. Joe has decided that romance and attraction are absolutely necessary; the other characteristics can be compromised. For Mel, engagement, curiosity, and common interests are a higher priority than comfort and security.

At the end of the day, it is all about choices.

[Please add your thoughts and experiences on this topic in the comment section of this blog.  This blog is intended as a forum for folks to raise issues, share experiences, and promote dialogue on important issues of contemporay life.   Please sign up as a Facebook Fan at www.docdreyfus.com/fanpage. For additional information about me and my practice, please visit my website at www.DocDreyfus.com. ]

Google Buzz
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • RSS

A Note of Appreciation

August 8th, 2010

Good morning,

I am writing to thank of you who have taken the time to comment on my posts.  It is very gratifying to know that you have found these essays useful, enjoyable, or thought provoking.  My mission as a clinical psychologist and life coach is to help people maximize their potential and achieve their goals.  I hope that these posts have served that mission.

While I do not have the time to reply to each post, please be assured that I do read each and every one.  If there are particular topics you would like me to address, please feel free to suggest them.

When you have a moment, you might want to visit my website at www.DocDreyfus.com There you will find additional essays dealing with such topics as alcohol and substance abuse, marriage, relationships, etc. You can also become a fan at www.docdreyfus.com/fanpage and follow me at www.twitter.com/docdreyfus

Again, thank you very much for reading and commenting.

Sincerely,

Edward A. Dreyfus, Ph.D.
Clinical Psychologist, Life Coach, Relationship Counselor, Sex Therapist

Google Buzz
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • RSS

Passionate or Sensible Marriage: Can You Have It All? (Part 1)

August 8th, 2010

This is a tough one!! I often hear people, patients and friends, ponder the issue of whether they should choose a mate about whom they feel passionate or should they choose a partner with whom they feel comfortable. They also question whether it is possible to have a passionate relationship that spans years.

Let’s take the case of Joe. Joe is a 30-something single man. He has been in a relationship with a woman for several years. He loves being with her. They have everything in common. They enjoy each others company. Joe says she is the first person with whom he wants to share the important things in his life. She is without a doubt his best friend; he cannot imagine his life without her. But…..he does not feel romantic-sexual towards her. Yes, they do have sex together, several times a week no less, yet he does not feel drawn toward her; there is no chemistry…for him. She feels all sorts of chemistry and passion toward him. It is just not reciprocated. Joe has been in several relationships. He has also had many one-nighters. He knows what it feels like to want to go to bed with a woman. He knows what it feels like to fall in love. He just does not experience any of these feelings with her. So here’s Joe’s dilemma.

In previous relationships Joe has felt the excitement of being with and wanting to be with a woman. However, there was always something about the relationship that didn’t feel really connected except in the bedroom. The woman was either not intellectually challenging, not interested in the things Joe was interested in, non-athletic, not psychologically-minded, non-nurturing or empathic, or some other short-fall. They were 70 percent of what Joe wanted in a mate. Joe wanted it all. Now he is with a woman who meets 90-percent, maybe 95-percent of what he is looking for. But the 5-10 percent is very important to him; it is the passionate, romantic, sexual part that is missing. So what’s Joe to do? Should he sacrifice his current relationship with his best friend who meets most of his requirements to continue the search for Ms. Right? Should he settle in with his current girlfriend knowing that she does not “light his fire”; after all, the flame always dies eventually, doesn’t it? What would you do?

Clearly Joe could have a good life with his girlfriend. Though he is not in love with her, he does love her. She, on the other hand, loves and is in love with him. It is not a reciprocal, symmetrical relationship. It is a practical relationship. They enjoy traveling together, dining together, doing things together, even just hanging out together. So what if he does not want to “jump her bones” or take a shower with her. One only spends a very small part of one’s life making love, right? And passionate sex fades over time, right? It is much like the reasoning of the woman in the Clint Eastwood, Meryl Streep movie Bridges Over Madison County, where the woman, married to a good man, has an affair with the romantic photo journalist, only to return to her farmer-husband to a good life that they built together. Did she make a wrong choice?

On the other hand, Joe knows what it feels like to be passionately connected to a woman. Would he regret staying with her or would he grow to appreciate the love they share together, the pleasure of being together?

[This is Part 1 of a two-part post]

[Please add your thoughts and experiences on this topic in the comment section of this blog.  This blog is intended as a forum for folks to raise issues, share experiences, and promote dialogue on important issues of contemporay life.   Please sign up as a Facebook Fan at www.docdreyfus.com/fanpage. For additional information about me and my practice, please visit my website at www.DocDreyfus.com. ]

Google Buzz